The Areopagus Script: So Near, and yet, So Far

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

So Near, and yet, So Far

This oft used phrase is “target locked” when it comes to purveying our spirituality against the standard by which are compared. The Lord, and those of us who are human, know that we can never attain the complete, or perfect, nature of God, this side of eternity. But, through the Spirit of God, His children are strengthened to pursue spiritual maturity and completion.

One such example of our being so near, but yet, so far away, would be the golden rule. Interestingly enough, compare the golden rule of conduct among men, with the Jewish rule of justice.

Historically, the axiom, “an eye for an eye”, as I understand it, was a description of retaliation that equated the crime to the punishment (Exodus 21:24). Such was a vast improvement in human relations over the vengeance in retaliation to which Cain was subjected. But, Jesus’ teachings, in Matthew 5:38, represent another improvement, and raises the bar toward complete and perfect spirituality. Does it?

Some have stated that “an eye for an eye” was a reactive, or retribution, statute. It certainly has evolved into such. But, at the heart of “an eye for an eye” is not reaction, but proaction. If a person knows the law allows equitable retaliation, it might serve as a deterrent to a harmful act. Whether stealing property, taking a life, causing injury, or harming in any way, knowing that the same can be inflicted to me, in retaliation, can serve to shape my behavior. So, you can see, the originator of the harmful cycle is just as governed as the initial victim who seeks retaliation under “an eye for an eye”.

In a sense, taken from the perspective of a man, he could pre-think his behavior, and come to the conclusion… if I don’t want my ox stolen, then I shouldn’t steal another man’s ox. Agree? Sounds a lot like the golden rule. So near, but yet, so far!

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” is the same, in many aspects, as the intent of “an eye for an eye”. However, “do unto others” provides a couple of clear and distinctive benefits to “an eye for an eye”.

First, it pre-empts any misapplication of “an eye for an eye”, and restricts, if not eliminates retaliation.

Second, and most importantly, “do unto others” is proactive, and goes to the heart of each individual. It eliminates the cycle of getting even. It promotes a spirit of well being among humans, and therefore, becomes more complete and more perfect, as the spiritual is compared to the carnal.

It is clear the Law showed God’s people how they could follow the letter of the law, and not ever connect with the spirit, or intent, of the Law. That’s why Jesus said He came to “fulfill” or complete the Law. Actually, He came to perfect His children, and conform them into the nature of the Father. So near, but yet, so far.

As a man thinks in his heart, so he is.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good stuff guys.

10:36 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Rules from the Areopagites